Role of The Notary in The Transition of Receivables (CESSIE) on Non-Load Loans in PT Bank Tabungan Negara

Ricky Yulianto Saputro, Tri Lisiani Prihatinah

Abstract


The settlement of bad debts through the transfer of receivables (CESSIE) is regulated in Article 613 of the Civil Code. However, in practice, there are problems regarding the mechanism for implementing the transfer of receivables (CESSIE) in the case of the Pekanbaru District Court decision Number 129/Pdt.G/2016/PN.PBR is then on appeal with the decision of the Pekanbaru High Court Number 59/Pdt.G/2017/PT.PBR. This study aims to analyze the mechanism for the transfer of receivables (CESSIE), which is considered valid by applicable legal provisions, and to examine and analyze the role of the Notary in the transfer of receivables (CESSIE). This study uses a normative juridical method, with the research specifications used prescriptively. The writing uses secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Methods Data collection using literature study with the method presented in the form of descriptive narrative text. Analysis The data were analyzed in a qualitative normative manner. The research results obtained are 4 (four) stages of the mechanism that are considered valid in settling bad loans through the transfer of receivables (cessie) by PT. Bank Tabungan Negara. First, the credit was declared bad by the Bank, in this case, PT. Bank. Tabungan Negara Second, by implementing the restructuring of credit belonging to debtors who are unable to carry out their performance as they should. Third, PT. Bank Tabungan Negara is required to subpoena 3 (three) times to the Debtor due to default by the Debtor. Fourth, through the transfer of receivables (CESSIE), which is bound by Mortgage Rights and contained in authentic deeds, PT. Bank Tabungan Negara can sell the object of collateral owned without the assistance of the Court. The four stages refer to the provisions of Article 1243 of the Civil Code, Law Number 10 of 1998, concerning Banking and its implementing regulations, namely Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 14/15/PBI/2012 concerning asset quality assessment of commercial banks which is now the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 40 / POJK.03/2019, and the Mortgage Law. If this fourth stage is not carried out, the mechanism for the transfer of receivables (CESSIE), which the Mortgage Rights do not bind, is still valid but is not related to the transfer of the object of collateral. The Notary's role in transferring receivables (CESSIE) in the case of Decision Number 129/Pdt.G/2016/PN. PBR is not following the provisions of the Law on Notary Positions. What is violated is that the Notary does not provide legal counseling as referred to in Article 15 paragraph (2) letter (e) of the Notary Position Act. The Notary is authorized to provide legal counseling regarding the deed. In the case of a transfer of sale and purchase of receivables (CESSIE), the role of the notary shifts as the Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) to transfer the mortgage guarantee from the old creditor (Cedent) to the new creditor (Cessionaris), the Deed of Transfer of Mortgage Rights (APHT) is then registered to the Office of the National Land Agency (BPN), thereby switching Mortgage Rights from the old creditor (Cedent) to the new creditor (Cessionaris). Without the transfer of Mortgage registration, the new creditor (cessionary) only becomes a congruent creditor, not a separatist creditor, and does not have preferential rights in paying off debtors' debts.

Keywords: Role of Notary, Bad Credit, Cessie 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adjie, Habib. (2009). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Budiono, Herlien. (2010). Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian dan Penerapannya di Bidang Kenotariatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Cahyono, Akhmad Budi. (2004). Cessie sebagai bentuk pengalihan piutang atas nama. Lex Jurnalica. Vol. 2. No.1.

Darus, M. Lutfan Hadi. (2017). Hukum Notariat dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: UII Press.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2014). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Umum.

Djangkarang, Muhammad Rizky. (1998). Lex Privatum, Vol.I/No.5/November/2013 disadur dalam Sri Kastini. Gadai Saham, Gadai Piutang dan Cessie. Hukum Jaminan Indonesia, Seri Dasar Hukum Ekonomi 4. Jakarta: ELIPS.

Feronika Y. Yangin. (2016). Analisis Hukum Pengalihan Piutang (Cessie) Kepada Pihak Ketiga Menurut Pasal 613 KUHPerdata. Lex Privatum. Vol. IV. No. 5.

Hadisoeprapto, Hartono. (1984). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan dan Hukum Jaminan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Hadjon, Philipus M. (1994). Fungsi Normatif Hukum Administrasi dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Bersih. Pidato Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Ilmu Hukum. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Hamzah, Andi. (2005). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hanitijo, Soemitro Ronny. (1988). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Yutimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (1986). Segi-segi Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (2006). Pembahasan, Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hariyani, Iswi. (2010). Restrukturisasi & Penghapusan Kredit Macet. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Hartati, Suharnoko & Endah. (2012). Doktrin Subrogasi, Novasi, dan Cessie. Cetakan ke-4. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Helena, Freddy Harris & Leny. (2007). Notaris Indonesia. Jakarta: Lintas Cetak Djaja.

Hermansyah. (2005). Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Kartono. (1977). Hak-Hak Jaminan Kredit. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita

Kasmir. (2000). Dasar-Dasar Perbankan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kelsen, Hans. (2007). Sebagaimana diterjemahkan oleh Somardi, General Theory of law and State, Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif Empiris. Jakarta: BEE Media Indonesia.

Kelsen, Hans. Teori Hukum Murni Dengan Judul Buku Asli “General Theory of Law and State.” Jakarta: Rumidi Pers.

Kusumawati, Rahma & H. Zaeni Asyhadie. (2018). Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia (Kajian Berdasarkan Hukum Nasional dan Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah). Mataram: Sinar Grafika.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Masjchoen, Sri Soedewi & Sofwan. (1980). Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Perorangan. Yogyakarta: C.V Bina Usaha.

Mertokusumo, Soedikno (1999). Mengenal Hukum sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Muhammad, Abdul Kadir. (1992). Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Muhammad, Abdul Kadir. (2009). Etika Profesi Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Muhtarom, M. (2014). Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian: Suatu Landasan Dalam Pembuatan Kontrak. Jurnal Suhuf. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Vol. 26. No. 1.

Mulyoto. (2012). Perjanjian; Teknik, Cara Membuat, dan Hukum Perjanjian yang Harus Dikuasai. Yogyakarta: Cakrawala Media.

Muslimin, Amrah. (1985). Beberapa Asas dan Pengertian Pokok Tentang Administrasi dan Hukum Administrasi. Bandung: Alumni.

Naja, Daeng. (2005). Hukum Kredit dan Bank Garansi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Notodisuryo, R. Soegondo. (1993). Hukum Notariat di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Notohamidjo, O. (2011). Soal-Soal Pokok Filsafat Hukum. Salatiga: Griya Media.

Nurbani, Erlies Septiana & Salim HS. (2013). Penerapan teori hukum pada penelitian tesis dan disertasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Pandoman, Agus. (2017). Perbuatan Hukum Tertentu dalam Sistem Hukum Agraria Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Raga Utama Kreasi.

Prodjodikiro, R. Wirjono. (2000). Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum dipandang dari sudut Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Rivai, Veithzal dkk. (2008). Islamic Financial Management (Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Panduan Praktis Untuk Lembaga Keuangan, Nasabah, Praktisi, dan Mahasiswa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sarwono, Sarlito Wirawan. (2014). Teori-Teori Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Satrio, J. (1999). Cessie, Subrogatie, Novatie, Kompensatie & Percampuran Hutang. Cet. 2. Bandung: Alumni.

Satrio, J. Rachmad Setiawan. (2010). Penjelasan Hukum tentang Cessie. Jakarta: Alumni.

Setiawan, R. (1979). Pokok–Pokok Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Bina Cipta.

Setiawan, Wawan. (2001). Kedudukan dan Keberadaan Pejabat Umum serta PPAT dibandingkan dengan Kedudukan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Pengurus Pusat Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (1993). Kebebasan Berkontrak Dan Perlindungan Yang Seimbang Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Jakarta: Institut Bankir Indonesia.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (1996). Hak Tanggungan : Asas-asas, ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok dan Masalah-Masalah Yang Dihadapi Perbankan. Airlangga University Press.

Subekti, R. (1987). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: PT Intermasa.

Sutedi, Adrian. (2012). Hukum Hak Tanggungan. Cetakan 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Tedjosaputro, Liliana. (1999). Mal Praktek Notaris dalam Hukum Pidana. Semarang: CV Agung.

Tobing, G.H.S. Lumban. (1999). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris-Notaris Regelment. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Usman, Rachmadi. (2009). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.2022.5.1.274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexed By:

 


Authentica: Privat Law Journal
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.