DEED OF SALE AND PURCHASE IN PRUDENTIAL PRINCIPLE APPLICATION BASED ON AN ABSOLUTE POWER OF ATTORNEY (STUDY DECISION NUMBER: 2255 K/PDT/2014)

GINA FELISSIMO HALEVI, TRI LISIANI PRIHATINAH, RIRIS ARDHANARISWARI

Abstract


The displacement of land rights through sale and purchase is required to be carried out before the PPAT either directly by the parties or by the attorney given power, the party which has been given the power of attorney by the land owner (seller) or by the buyer with a power of attorney to sell, made before a Notary, however, power of attorney for selling can be the basis for buying and selling land as stated in the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14 of 1982 concerning the Prohibition of Absolute Power of Attorney as a Transfer of Land Rights issued on March 6 1982, to that, a Notary /PPAT must take an attentive action in the land sales process, despite the fact that the Notary/PPAT does not fully implement the principle of prudence, in addition, the legal validity of the Deed made is questionable. The formulation in this research is: (1) What is the validity of the use of an absolute power of attorney made by a notary in making a land sale and purchase deed? (2) How is the Precautionary Principle applied to the Preparation of Sale-Purchase Deeds by PPAT? This research was conducted using a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The research specification used is an analytical perspective, such as describing and analyzing facts through a statutory approach. The source of legal materials use library research data techniques based on research results. Notaries/PPATs in carrying out their duties and authority must always use the principle of prudence and either PPAT in making authentic deeds should be based on absolute power of attorney and the validity of the power of attorney, in which PPAT should have rejected from the start because absolute power of attorney is prohibited in the land buying and selling process.

Keywords: Precautionary principle; Notary/PPAT; Absolute power of attorney.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aulia, A. (2022). Prinsip Kehati-hatian PPAT Dalam Proses Pengikatan Jual Beli. Recital Review, 252.

Baharudin. (2014). Kewenangan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Dalam Proses Jual Beli Tanah. JDIH Perpustakaan Hukum UBL.

Budiono, H. (2016). Perwakilan, Kuasa dan Pemberian Kuasa. Majalah Renvoi.

Harsono, B. (2008). Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Himpunan Peraturan-Peraturan Hukum Tanah. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Harsono, B. (2018). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.

Hatta Isnaini Wahyu Utomo, H. D. (2018). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dalam Peralihan Tanah yang Belum Bersertifikat. Ius Quia Iustum.

Huijbers, T. (1982). Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Kartini Muljadi, G. W. (2014). Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Khairandy, R. (2016). Perjanjian Jual Beli. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Marhainis, A. (1982). Hukum Perdata Material. PT. Pradnya Paramita.

Ningsih, u. d. (2012). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Semarang: Widya Karya.

Notodisoerjo, R. S. (1982). Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Parlindungan, A. P. (1999). Pendaftaran Tanah di Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju.

Salim. (2016). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Tanah Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Salim. (2017). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian (TPA Dua). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Salindeho, J. (1987). Masalah Tanah Dalam Pembangunan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Salindeho, J. (1987). Masalah Tanah Dalam Pembangunan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Santoso, U. (2016 ). Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah , Perspektif Regulasi, Wewenang dan Sifat Akta Teknik Pembuatan Akta . Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Sinelele, A. (2020). Klausul Kuasa Mutlak Dalam Akta Jual Beli Tanah Di Kota Palopo. El-Iqtishady.

Sinilele, A. (2020). Klausul Kuasa Mutlak Dalam Akta Jual Beli Tanah di Kota Palopo. El-Iqtishady Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syari'ah.

Smith, A. (1976). The Theory Of Moral Sentimens Indianapolis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Soepomo, R. (1982). Hukum Perdata Adat Jawa Barat. Jakarta: Penerbitan Djambatan.

Soimin, S. (2008). Status Hak dan Pembebasan Tanah. Jakarta: Sinar grafika.

Subekti, R. (1995). Aneka Perjanjian. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Tobing, G. L. (1980). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Usman, R. (2003). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Vania, C. (2018). Keabsahan Penggunaan Kuasa Mutlak Dalam Perjanjian Pengikat Jual Beli (PPJB) Tanah Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris. Jurnal Hukum Adigama.

Wartini, S. (2007). Implementasi Prinsip Kehati-hatian Dalam Sanitary And Phythosanitary Agreemant, Studi Kasus: Keputusan Appellate Body WTO Dalam Kasus Hormone Beef Antara Uni Eropa Dengan Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Hukum, 14(2).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.2023.6.2.393

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexed By:

 


Authentica: Privat Law Journal
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.