LEGAL BASIS FOR REPORTING EMBEZZLEMENT OF MOTORIZED VEHICLES (OBJECTS OF FIDUCIARY GUARANTEES) TRANSFERRED TO THIRD PARTIES BY FIDUCIARIES WITH PAWNING

ARI TRI WIBOWO

Abstract


This research aims to analyze the validity of the pledge agreement for fiduciary collateral objects and also how the fiduciary object is reported to be embezzled by the fiduciary object regarding fiduciary objects transferred by him to a third party. The research method used was normative legal research, with the main data source using secondary data, analyzed normatively qualitatively. This research was conducted because of many cases occurring related to the transfers of fiduciary objects without the consent of fiduciary recipient by fiduciary grantor, leading to such disputes as the embezzlement of fiduciary objects and most people not knowing how to resolve the dispute through legal channels. This research found that the validity of a pawn agreement on fiduciary collateral objects is determined by the preparation of a notarial and registered fiduciary security deed as well as a transfer having received written permission from the fiduciary grantor, then the reporting of fiduciary object embezzlement can be done by the fiduciary grantor based on Article 372 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) rather than on Article 36 of the Fiduciary Law.

Keywords: Fiduciary; Embezlement; Motor Vehicles; Guarantee.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar, M. (1986). Hukum Pidana Khusus (KUHP Buku II). Alumni.

Hadisoeprapto, H. (1984). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan dan Hukum Jaminan. Liberty.

Humas Polda Sulawesi Utara. (2022). Pelaku Penggelapan dan Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Diamankan Satreskrim Polresta Manado.

Irwansyah. (2022). Penelitian Hukum, Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.

Jamil, M. (2021). Fiduciary Security Arrangements and Issues in Indonesia. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i2.1

Kalteng, P. (2023). Polda Kalteng : Pelaku Penggelapan dan/atau mengalihkan atau menyewakan Jaminan Fidusia , Berhasil Diringkus Satreskrim Polres Kapuas.

Kamello, T. (2014). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan. Alumni.

Khairandy, R. (2013). Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan (Bagian Pertama). FH UII Press.

Lamintang, P. A. . (1997). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Baru.

Mangunkusumo, S. (1981). Suatu Tinjauan Mengenai Sistematika Jaminan Yang Diharuskan oleh Pasal 24 UU Perbankan No. 14-1967 Bagi Pemberian Kredit oleh Bank Umum. Bina Cipta.

Mertokusumo, S. (1985). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Munir Fuady. (2006). Hukum Tentang Pembiayaan. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Pramono, N. (2012). Problematika Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Pembatalan Perjanjian. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16221

Riabchinska, A. (2021). The relationship between fiduciary ownership as a means of ensuring the fulfilment of the obligation and pledge. National Technical University of Ukraine Journal. Political Science. Sociology. Law. https://doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2020.4(48).233298

Satrio, J. (2002). Hukum Jaminan, Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Siamat, D. (2004). Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Sunggono, B. (1995). Pengantar Hukum Perbankan. Mandar Maju.

Usman, R. (2008). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Sinar Grafika.

Usman, R. (2011). Hukum Kebendaan. Sinar Grafika.

Wiyanto, R. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Mandar Maju.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.2023.6.2.433

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexed By:

 


Authentica: Privat Law Journal
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.