Legal Protection for Creditors Against Validity of Trade Binding Act with Loan Without Dependent Rights (Analysis of Verdict Number: 34/Pdt/2017/PT. YYK and Number : 214/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt Sel)

Nina Trisnowati

Abstract


Credit, which was previously considered taboo, is now a necessity in society. Everyone is looking for convenience for credit without knowing the risks and impacts that will occur in the future. The most important element of credit (debt) is the trust of the creditor towards the borrower as the debtor. Sale and Purchase Agreement (hereinafter referred to as PJB) is an agreement between a seller to sell his property to a buyer made with a notarial deed. Cases that occurred in Yogyakarta High Court Decision Number 34 / Pdt /2017/PT.YYK and District Court Decision Number 214 / Pdt, G / 2014 / PN. Jkt.Sel is a case of debt receivable with collateral for a certificate of land rights and the parties poured their agreement into the Sale and Purchase Binding Act (PPJB) and the Selling Power of Attorney, considering that after the two decisions, there was an outstanding debt problem, while the debtor was still have not been able to repay their debts to creditors, with guarantees of certificates of land rights without mortgage. The purpose of this study was to analyze the judges' consideration of the decision Number 34 / Pdt /2017/PT.YYK with Decision Number 214 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN. Jkt Cell regarding sale and purchase agreement. analyze the legal protection for creditors against the validity of the deed of sale and purchase agreement with a loan without mortgage. analyze repayment by defaulting debtors relating to debts and loans without mortgages. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method, analyzed Normatively Qualitatively, The results of the study show that in Decision Number 34 / Pdt /2017/PT.YYK which states are null and void and do not have the power to bind an authentic deed regarding the "Purchase Bond" Number 01/2015 and authentic deed in the form of "Sales Authority" Number 02/2015 , because based on the Supreme Court Jurisprudence of the Republic of Indonesia number 275K / PDT / 2004. Whereas as a comparison for Decision Number 214 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN. Jkt Cell, which originally had a legal relationship, that is, debt and receivables which stated that the Plaintiff was proven to have committed a default on the Defendant, stated the Purchase Binding Agreement No. 45 dated July 11, 2008 and all of its derivatives are valid and correct deeds; declare the Deed of Credit Recognition No. 46 dated July 11, 2008 and all of its derivatives are valid and correct deeds; certifies Fiduciary Deed (movable property) No. 47 dated July 11, 2008 and all of its derivatives are valid and correct deeds.

 

Keywords: Legal Protection, Debt-Receivables, Binding Agreement of Purchase, Abuse of Circumstances.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Budiono, H. (2004). Artikel Pengikat Jual Beli Dan Kuasa Mutlak Majalah Renvoi, 1(10).

Satrio. J. (2002). Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Budiono, H. (2008). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan, Cet. Kedua, Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Aristoteles, E. Utrecht. (1992). Pengantar Dalam Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Buku Ichtiar.

Budiono, H. (2007). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Gr.Van der Burght. (1999). Buku Tentang Perikatan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Satrio, J. (1995). Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian, Buku II, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Limbong, B. (2012). Hukum Agraria Nasional. ctk. Pertama, Jakarta: Margaretha Pustaka.

Hadjon, P.M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu.

Muhammad, A. (2010). Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti

Nolan-Haley, J.M. (1992.) Alternative Dispute Resolution In Arbitration, Nushell, ST.Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co.

Pieter E. L. (2012). Cacat Yuridis Akta Notaris Dalam peristiwa Hukum Konkrit dan Implikasi Hukumnya, Jakarta: TUMA Press.

Putri, D.K. (2017). Perbedaan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Lunas Dengan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tidak Lunas. Jurnal Akta. 4(4).

Subekti. R. (2002). Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta: Internusa, Jakarta.

Rahardjo, S. (1993). Penyelenggaraan Keadilan Dalam Masyarakat Yang Sedang Berubah, Jurnal Masalah Hukum. Edisi 10.

Saefudin, Y. (2017). Urgency of Integrated Assessment on Drugs Crime (A Study in Purbalingga Regency). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 17 (3). 40-52.

Saptanti, N & Wiwoho, M. J. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Terhadap Pembatalan Akta Pengakuan Hutang Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Repertorium, 3.

Setiono. (2004). Rule Of Law (supremasi hukum), Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (1984). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press.

Subekti. (2005). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.2020.3.2.45

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexed By:

 


Authentica: Privat Law Journal
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.