Absolute Power on Land Rights Binding Agreement (Study of Verdict No. 698K/Pdt/2017 and Number 483/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Bdg)
Abstract
In the sale and purchase of land rights transactions, before the parties make a sale as outlined in the form of a Purchase Deed made before the Land Deed Maker Officer, the parties first make an agreement made in the form of an authentic deed made before a notary called with the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB). Binding Agreement of Purchase made by a notary is always followed by a power of attorney called absolute power of attorney. According to the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 14 of 1982, the use of absolute power is prohibited from using it for the transfer of land rights. This study aims to analyze the validity of granting absolute power clauses in the Purchase Binding Agreement which is used as the basis for the transfer of land rights and analyzing the application of absolute power in the Land Purchase Binding Agreement for land rights, especially against Decision Number 698K / Pdt / 2017 and Number 483 / Pdt. G / 2013 / PN.Bdg. The research method used is normative juridical research by examining secondary data, supplemented by a legislative approach and a case approach. This type of research is Analytical Descriptive using legal inventory research, legal principles, legal discovery in concreto. Data analysis was performed using the Normative Qualitative analysis method. The results of this study indicate that: (1) The validity of the absolute power which is entered as a clause in the Binding Agreement of Purchase is valid. Purchase Binding Agreement as a preliminary agreement (Pactum De Contrahendo) which gave birth to the granting of absolute power clause is an inseparable unit of the Purchase Binding Agreement so that the granting of an absolute power clause in the Sale and Purchase Agreement is not included in the absolute power of attorney which is prohibited by applicable laws and regulations. (2) a. Decision Case Number 698K / Pdt / 2017, the granting of absolute power which is used as the basis for the transfer of land rights is invalid because the absolute power of attorney is not based on the principal agreement, thus contradicting the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14 of 1982. b. Decision Case Number 483 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.Bdg, the granting of absolute power which is used as the basis for the transfer of land rights is legal, because the absolute power of attorney is based on the principal agreement, so it does not conflict with the Minister of Home Affairs Instruction Number 14 of 1982.
Keywords: Binding Agreement of Purchase; Absolute Power of Attorney; Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 14 of 1982.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ardana Reswari, Gedion. (2014). Surat Kuasa Mutlak Pada Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Rechtens. 3 (1). 4 – 15.
Ayu Wulan Rismayanti, Ida. (2016). Tanggung Jawab PPAT Terhadap Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah. Tesis. Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Udayana.
Budiono, Herlien. (2014). Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris, Cetakan II. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya.
Dadang Sukandar, Yang Perlu Diperhatikan Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli, http://www.legalakses.com. Retreived on March 14, 2019.
Departemen Dalam Negeri Direktorat Jenderal Agraria. (1985). Tata Laksana Pengurusan Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta: Yayasan Hudaya Bina Sejahtera.
Hendra, Tinjauan Surat Kuasa Mutlak, http://hukumonline.com/berita/kuasamutlak/. Retreived on June 14, 2007.
Irma Devita Purnamasari, Pengikatan Jual Beli dan Kuasa untuk Menjual, http://www.hukumonline.com/. Retreived on August 24, 2017
Pandoman, Agus. (2017). Perbuatan Hukum Tertentu Dalam Sistem Hukum Agraria Di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Raga Utama Kreasi.
Prayoto. (2009). Aspek Hukum Terhadap Klausul Kuasa Mutlak Dalam Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah, Tesis, Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Diponegoro.
Satriyo Wicaksono, Frans. (2009). Panduan Lengkap Membuat Surat-Surat Kuasa, Jakarta: Visimedia Pustaka.
Sjamsi, Kusworo. (2012). Surat Kuasa Yang Tidak Dicabut Kembali Dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 1 (2). 20 – 25
Subekti, R dan Tjitrosudibio, R. (1981). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, Cet-XIV.
Subekti, R. (1987). Hukum Perjanjian, Bandung : Bina Cipta.
Suharnoko. (2004). Hukum Perjanjian Teori dan Analisa Kasus, Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.2019.2.1.59
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed By:
Authentica: Privat Law Journal Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.