Analysis of The Consideration of The Judges over A Suit Violating The Law in Palembang State Of Court (The Study Of Decision No. 166/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Plg)

Efka Firsta

Abstract


The doctrine of violating the law (onrechtmatige daad) is regulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code from narrow teachings which interpret that the nature of illegal acts (onrechtmatige daad ) is similar to acts against laws or written law, has developed into a broad teaching. Violation of Article 1365 of the Criminal Code The person who commits a violation of the law and causes a loss shall be obliged to compensate the said loss. Compensation can be in the form of money, restored to its original state, the claimant is entitled to request that the judge stated that the act was an unlawful act atu su s ebagaimana lawsuit in Pu decision- No. 166/Pdt.G/2014/PN/Plg. The plaintiff's party has stated that the defendant's actions violated Article 1365 of the Civil Code but the judge refused as an illegal act. The court not only decides the case procedurally but needs to have a legal breakthrough as a step of legal discovery (rechtvinding) so that it covers the frame of mind as a legal reasoning about how the judge must decide on a case. The research using normative and based on secondary data to support success. Based on this, a problem was found on the basis of the judge's consideration so that the Plaintiff's Violating Action Act in the above case was rejected by the Palembang District Court Judge as in Decision No. 166/Pdt.G/ 2014/PN.Plg.

Keywords:  violating the law; lawsuit; compensation


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asrof, H.A.M.(2009). Membedah Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Wanprestasi, Jurnal Varia Peradilan. XXIV(286). 31-37.

Bimasakti, MA. (2018). Onrechtmatig Overheidsdaad (OOD) Perbuatan melawan Hukum Oleh Penguasa, Jurnal Varia Peradilan. XXXIII(391).68-76.

Fuady, M. (2013). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pendekatan Kontemporer. Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, MY. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan,Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ibrahim, J. (2008). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.

Isnaeni, M. (2017). Selintas Pintas Hukum Perikatan (Bagian Umum). Surabaya: PT.Revka Petra Media.

Isnantiana, NI. (2017) Legal Reasoning Hakim Dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan, Jurnal Islamadina. XVIII(2) 2. 41-56

Marzuki, PM (2011) Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muhammad, A. (2000) Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mulyadi, L. (2009) Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Murni, RAR, I Gusti Ayu Puspawati. (2016). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Konteks Etika Bisnis, Proceeding Konfrensi Nasional Hukum Perdata II, APHK dan FH Universitas Udayana. 330-343.

Pramono, HW. (2013). Mahkamah Agung: Antara Judex Juris atau Judex Facti, Jurnal Varia Peradilan. XXVII (333). 67-72

Prodjodikoro, RW. (2000). Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Dipandang Dari Sudut Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Santoso, L.(2016). Hukum Perikatan Teori Hukum dan Teknis Pembuatan Kontrak, Kerjasama dan Bisnis. Malang: Setara Press.

Soekanto, S and Pamuji, S. (2011) Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Wantu, FM. (2017). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Proses Putusan Hakim di Peradilan Perdata, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 12(3). 478-483.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.2018.1.2.11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexed By:

 


Authentica: Privat Law Journal
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.